https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310218 Section 311 CrPC may be used to recall a witness only when the court is satisfied that it is essential for a just decision; it should not be used to cure a prosecution lapse by introducing disclosure statements after evidence has closed if that would prejudice the accused. Section 27 of the Evidence Act permits only the part of information that distinctly leads to discovery, and recovery records should ordinarily record the disclosure in first person to preserve fairness. On these facts, late recall of the investigating officer for proof of the disclosure statements was not warranted. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:39:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310218 Section 311 CrPC may be used to recall a witness only when the court is satisfied that it is essential for a just decision; it should not be used to cure a prosecution lapse by introducing disclosure statements after evidence has closed if that would prejudice the accused. Section 27 of the Evidence Act permits only the part of information that distinctly leads to discovery, and recovery records should ordinarily record the disclosure in first person to preserve fairness. On these facts, late recall of the investigating officer for proof of the disclosure statements was not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310218