https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310214 The High Court rejected the petition for a certificate to appeal to the Supreme Court in a land dispute case. The High Court found that the alleged Benami transaction was not proven, and the claimed easement rights were not established. Additionally, a valuation dispute regarding the land and trees led to a reduced valuation after the Senior Sub Judge's revision. The High Court determined that the case did not involve exceptional features warranting Supreme Court appeal, as the subject-matter value did not exceed Rs. 20,000 and lacked significant public importance. Costs were awarded to the respondent. en-us Wed, 18 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:45:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310214 The High Court rejected the petition for a certificate to appeal to the Supreme Court in a land dispute case. The High Court found that the alleged Benami transaction was not proven, and the claimed easement rights were not established. Additionally, a valuation dispute regarding the land and trees led to a reduced valuation after the Senior Sub Judge's revision. The High Court determined that the case did not involve exceptional features warranting Supreme Court appeal, as the subject-matter value did not exceed Rs. 20,000 and lacked significant public importance. Costs were awarded to the respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310214