https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310213 The court dismissed the civil revision petition, ruling that the ex parte appointment of a commissioner under Order 26, Rule 9, C.P.C., was lawful due to urgency. The commissioner's plan and report are not automatically evidence but are to be considered by the judge, with parties having the right to object and examine the commissioner. Procedural requirements under Order 26, Rule 18, C.P.C., were satisfied as the defendant had notice and participated in the commissioner's inquiry. en-us Tue, 16 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:44:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310213 The court dismissed the civil revision petition, ruling that the ex parte appointment of a commissioner under Order 26, Rule 9, C.P.C., was lawful due to urgency. The commissioner's plan and report are not automatically evidence but are to be considered by the judge, with parties having the right to object and examine the commissioner. Procedural requirements under Order 26, Rule 18, C.P.C., were satisfied as the defendant had notice and participated in the commissioner's inquiry. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310213