<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 1064 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310209</link>
    <description>An adverse administrative action affecting service rights cannot be sustained on the basis of a fact-finding report unless the affected persons are supplied the material and given notice and a fair opportunity to respond before the final decision. Because the appellants were not furnished the inquiry report and were denied pre-decisional hearing, the cancellation of their placement and consequential termination breached natural justice and was invalid. The alleged illegality in placement also could not justify termination where the record did not show fraud, undue influence, or manipulation by the appellants, and the statutory scheme could not be applied on the basis of a one-sided inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:03:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 1064 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310209</link>
      <description>An adverse administrative action affecting service rights cannot be sustained on the basis of a fact-finding report unless the affected persons are supplied the material and given notice and a fair opportunity to respond before the final decision. Because the appellants were not furnished the inquiry report and were denied pre-decisional hearing, the cancellation of their placement and consequential termination breached natural justice and was invalid. The alleged illegality in placement also could not justify termination where the record did not show fraud, undue influence, or manipulation by the appellants, and the statutory scheme could not be applied on the basis of a one-sided inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>