<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 50 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34265</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the ITAT for reconsideration due to conflicting views on the interpretation of Section 10 (10CC) regarding the exemption of income tax paid by the employer on behalf of employees. The Court emphasized the importance of consistency in applying tax laws and did not provide a final opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 50 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34265</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the ITAT for reconsideration due to conflicting views on the interpretation of Section 10 (10CC) regarding the exemption of income tax paid by the employer on behalf of employees. The Court emphasized the importance of consistency in applying tax laws and did not provide a final opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>