<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 494 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444271</link>
    <description>Cement cleared in MRP-marked bags for self-consumption within the factory and for free issue to a contractor for construction work was held eligible for concessional duty under Notification No. 4/2006-CE. CESTAT Chennai followed its earlier view and applied judicial discipline, holding that the benefit could not be denied merely because the goods were not sold in the ordinary retail market. The demand was therefore not sustainable, as the mode of use did not exclude the clearances from the notification&#039;s concessional treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 494 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444271</link>
      <description>Cement cleared in MRP-marked bags for self-consumption within the factory and for free issue to a contractor for construction work was held eligible for concessional duty under Notification No. 4/2006-CE. CESTAT Chennai followed its earlier view and applied judicial discipline, holding that the benefit could not be denied merely because the goods were not sold in the ordinary retail market. The demand was therefore not sustainable, as the mode of use did not exclude the clearances from the notification&#039;s concessional treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>