<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444270</link>
    <description>Tinted glass sheets were held commercially distinct from plain glass panes and, applying the common and commercial parlance test, fell within the entry for goods and wares made of glass rather than the exclusion for plain glass panes. The exclusion was construed strictly, so it could not be enlarged to cover tinted glass sheets; the revenue&#039;s classification and higher tax levy were sustained. A reassessment notice for earlier years, based on the same classification issue for the same commodity, was also upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444270</link>
      <description>Tinted glass sheets were held commercially distinct from plain glass panes and, applying the common and commercial parlance test, fell within the entry for goods and wares made of glass rather than the exclusion for plain glass panes. The exclusion was construed strictly, so it could not be enlarged to cover tinted glass sheets; the revenue&#039;s classification and higher tax levy were sustained. A reassessment notice for earlier years, based on the same classification issue for the same commodity, was also upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>