<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 492 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444269</link>
    <description>HC upheld the assessment of unaccounted local sales and variation in physical stock, holding that the Assessing Authority&#039;s best judgment enhancement of sales by 10% of net GTO (after stock transfers) was fair and within powers under the DST Act. The burden under Section 6 DST Act to prove non-liability was not discharged by the appellant. However, HC set aside the second limb of demand under the CST Act, ruling that mere stock transfers from Delhi to out-of-State depots did not constitute inter-State sales absent proof of transfer of property in goods. The challenge to non-supply of documents was rejected, and the appeal was partly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 492 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444269</link>
      <description>HC upheld the assessment of unaccounted local sales and variation in physical stock, holding that the Assessing Authority&#039;s best judgment enhancement of sales by 10% of net GTO (after stock transfers) was fair and within powers under the DST Act. The burden under Section 6 DST Act to prove non-liability was not discharged by the appellant. However, HC set aside the second limb of demand under the CST Act, ruling that mere stock transfers from Delhi to out-of-State depots did not constitute inter-State sales absent proof of transfer of property in goods. The challenge to non-supply of documents was rejected, and the appeal was partly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>