<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 474 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444251</link>
    <description>HC analyzed a tax dispute involving blocked electronic credit ledger under TNGST Rules. The court found merit in petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax order, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the case back to respondent for fresh proceedings within eight weeks. The amount already paid by petitioner would be subject to final appropriation after de novo review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 474 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444251</link>
      <description>HC analyzed a tax dispute involving blocked electronic credit ledger under TNGST Rules. The court found merit in petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax order, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the case back to respondent for fresh proceedings within eight weeks. The amount already paid by petitioner would be subject to final appropriation after de novo review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>