<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 452 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444229</link>
    <description>All Industry Rate drawback could not be denied or recomputed merely because exported goods contained duty-free inputs imported under an Advance Licence, since the drawback scheme operates on a consolidated presumptive basis and not on input-wise attribution. The Court noted that the Foreign Trade Policy and Circular No. 19/2005-Cus permit drawback on that basis, and field officers cannot dissect actual consumption to reduce the claim. The importer-manufacturer was also allowed to retain both the Advance Licence benefit and drawback on the facts found, because the duty-free input had already met the export obligation and its post-obligation use did not bar drawback. The revenue challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:03:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 452 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444229</link>
      <description>All Industry Rate drawback could not be denied or recomputed merely because exported goods contained duty-free inputs imported under an Advance Licence, since the drawback scheme operates on a consolidated presumptive basis and not on input-wise attribution. The Court noted that the Foreign Trade Policy and Circular No. 19/2005-Cus permit drawback on that basis, and field officers cannot dissect actual consumption to reduce the claim. The importer-manufacturer was also allowed to retain both the Advance Licence benefit and drawback on the facts found, because the duty-free input had already met the export obligation and its post-obligation use did not bar drawback. The revenue challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>