https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310190 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the trial court's decision to allow the respondent to withdraw the suit unconditionally. It found no merit in the petitioners' arguments concerning the advantage gained by the respondent during the proceedings, the prior finding regarding possession, or the nature of the impugned order. The court determined that the petitioners had no interest in the premises after relinquishing possession to the owners and that the trial court's order was not an improper exercise of jurisdiction. The rule was discharged with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:50:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310190 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the trial court's decision to allow the respondent to withdraw the suit unconditionally. It found no merit in the petitioners' arguments concerning the advantage gained by the respondent during the proceedings, the prior finding regarding possession, or the nature of the impugned order. The court determined that the petitioners had no interest in the premises after relinquishing possession to the owners and that the trial court's order was not an improper exercise of jurisdiction. The rule was discharged with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310190