<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 607 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310188</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC dismissed the plaintiff&#039;s revision petition to withdraw a suit with liberty to file afresh on the same cause. The trial court&#039;s rejection was upheld as the suit was at its final stage, and withdrawal could result in multiplicity of proceedings. The court emphasized that special circumstances are required to permit such withdrawals, justifying the decision based on the time already invested in the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:23:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 607 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310188</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC dismissed the plaintiff&#039;s revision petition to withdraw a suit with liberty to file afresh on the same cause. The trial court&#039;s rejection was upheld as the suit was at its final stage, and withdrawal could result in multiplicity of proceedings. The court emphasized that special circumstances are required to permit such withdrawals, justifying the decision based on the time already invested in the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>