<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 134 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310185</link>
    <description>A composite request under Order 23 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for withdrawal of a suit with liberty to file a fresh suit cannot be split into separate parts. The text states that liberty to institute a fresh suit is available only where a formal defect or sufficient ground is shown; on the stated facts, no such basis existed, so liberty was rightly refused. It further states that once liberty is refused, the court cannot still permit withdrawal without liberty and dismiss the suit as withdrawn; the proper course is to reject the request and keep the suit pending for trial. The suit was restored for adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 134 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310185</link>
      <description>A composite request under Order 23 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for withdrawal of a suit with liberty to file a fresh suit cannot be split into separate parts. The text states that liberty to institute a fresh suit is available only where a formal defect or sufficient ground is shown; on the stated facts, no such basis existed, so liberty was rightly refused. It further states that once liberty is refused, the court cannot still permit withdrawal without liberty and dismiss the suit as withdrawn; the proper course is to reject the request and keep the suit pending for trial. The suit was restored for adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>