<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 42 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34251</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the ITAT and CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of loss in share transactions and deduction of interest. It found the share transactions to be genuine, supported by market value evidence and broker involvement. The Court criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s selective approach and reliance on limited records. Regarding the interest deduction, the Court noted the absence of a nexus between the interest-free advances and the bank loan, allowing for the deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 42 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34251</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the ITAT and CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of loss in share transactions and deduction of interest. It found the share transactions to be genuine, supported by market value evidence and broker involvement. The Court criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s selective approach and reliance on limited records. Regarding the interest deduction, the Court noted the absence of a nexus between the interest-free advances and the bank loan, allowing for the deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>