https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310182 The SC quashed the appointments of twenty-four candidates recommended by the Government of Mysore and sixteen candidates selected through a compromise before the HC due to a flawed selection process. The Court found discrepancies in marks and a lack of merit-based selection, emphasizing the importance of maintaining public trust and upholding meritocracy in public appointments. The decision underscored the need for fair and transparent selection processes, allowing the petitions to the extent indicated to ensure equality and justice. en-us Mon, 28 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:21:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310182 The SC quashed the appointments of twenty-four candidates recommended by the Government of Mysore and sixteen candidates selected through a compromise before the HC due to a flawed selection process. The Court found discrepancies in marks and a lack of merit-based selection, emphasizing the importance of maintaining public trust and upholding meritocracy in public appointments. The decision underscored the need for fair and transparent selection processes, allowing the petitions to the extent indicated to ensure equality and justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310182