<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 440 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2010-11 was not justified as it was based on estimated additions. The Tribunal held that penalties cannot be levied on estimated additions, citing legal precedents. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 440 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2010-11 was not justified as it was based on estimated additions. The Tribunal held that penalties cannot be levied on estimated additions, citing legal precedents. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>