<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 436 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444213</link>
    <description>Mere cutting, splitting, or flavouring of areca nuts does not create a new commercial product for tariff purposes; the goods therefore remain classifiable as areca nuts under Heading 08028090 rather than as a betel nut preparation under Tariff Item 21069030. On that basis, the exemption claim was rejected, and the differential duty demand, confiscation, and penalty were sustained because the product was misdeclared and the test reports supported the Revenue&#039;s classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 436 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444213</link>
      <description>Mere cutting, splitting, or flavouring of areca nuts does not create a new commercial product for tariff purposes; the goods therefore remain classifiable as areca nuts under Heading 08028090 rather than as a betel nut preparation under Tariff Item 21069030. On that basis, the exemption claim was rejected, and the differential duty demand, confiscation, and penalty were sustained because the product was misdeclared and the test reports supported the Revenue&#039;s classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>