<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 419 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444196</link>
    <description>Where an earlier remand order only laid down broad principles and did not finally decide the factual controversy, a later order passed on remand containing fresh factual findings is independently challengeable. The High Court held that treating such a challenge as an impermissible review of the earlier Tribunal order was incorrect because the later order addressed new findings on the nature of the contract, labour deductions, C-Forms and tax rate. The petitioner was therefore entitled to assail those findings, and the Tribunal could not deny a remedy against adverse conclusions first recorded after remand. The dismissal was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh merits consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:41:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 419 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444196</link>
      <description>Where an earlier remand order only laid down broad principles and did not finally decide the factual controversy, a later order passed on remand containing fresh factual findings is independently challengeable. The High Court held that treating such a challenge as an impermissible review of the earlier Tribunal order was incorrect because the later order addressed new findings on the nature of the contract, labour deductions, C-Forms and tax rate. The petitioner was therefore entitled to assail those findings, and the Tribunal could not deny a remedy against adverse conclusions first recorded after remand. The dismissal was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh merits consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>