<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 413 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444190</link>
    <description>SC remanded tax adjudication orders due to tax consultant&#039;s negligence. Court set aside ex parte orders and directed fresh proceedings within six weeks, conditional on petitioner depositing 20% disputed tax and paying Rs.5 lakhs cost. Decision emphasized as exceptional, not precedential, highlighting importance of professional diligence in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 413 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444190</link>
      <description>SC remanded tax adjudication orders due to tax consultant&#039;s negligence. Court set aside ex parte orders and directed fresh proceedings within six weeks, conditional on petitioner depositing 20% disputed tax and paying Rs.5 lakhs cost. Decision emphasized as exceptional, not precedential, highlighting importance of professional diligence in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>