<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 403 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444180</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the assessment order against a struck-off company for AY 2015-16, emphasizing the need to revive the company before initiating assessment proceedings. The respondent was directed to follow the proper procedure by reviving the company through the NCLT under the Companies Act before re-initiating proceedings under the Income Tax Act. The Writ Petition was allowed, and the assessment order was annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 403 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444180</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the assessment order against a struck-off company for AY 2015-16, emphasizing the need to revive the company before initiating assessment proceedings. The respondent was directed to follow the proper procedure by reviving the company through the NCLT under the Companies Act before re-initiating proceedings under the Income Tax Act. The Writ Petition was allowed, and the assessment order was annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>