<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for assessment years 2010-11 and 2012-13, ruling that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were impermissible as they lacked incriminating material. The Tribunal emphasized that in completed assessments, such additions could not be sustained. The decision, delivered by the ITAT Mumbai, favored the assessee, rendering the need to address the issues on merit unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for assessment years 2010-11 and 2012-13, ruling that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were impermissible as they lacked incriminating material. The Tribunal emphasized that in completed assessments, such additions could not be sustained. The decision, delivered by the ITAT Mumbai, favored the assessee, rendering the need to address the issues on merit unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>