<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 547 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310179</link>
    <description>Circumstantial evidence may sustain a murder and conspiracy conviction when proved facts form a complete chain pointing unerringly to guilt; the court treated motive, movements, recoveries, medical evidence, fingerprints, and post-offence conduct as mutually reinforcing. A confession recorded with the required safeguards remains admissible if voluntary and true, and it may be used against co-conspirators once the prosecution shows reasonable grounds to infer conspiracy. A forensic report is not excluded merely because it is signed by a Joint Director, if it falls within the statutory category of admissible laboratory reports. On these principles, the convictions were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:25:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 547 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310179</link>
      <description>Circumstantial evidence may sustain a murder and conspiracy conviction when proved facts form a complete chain pointing unerringly to guilt; the court treated motive, movements, recoveries, medical evidence, fingerprints, and post-offence conduct as mutually reinforcing. A confession recorded with the required safeguards remains admissible if voluntary and true, and it may be used against co-conspirators once the prosecution shows reasonable grounds to infer conspiracy. A forensic report is not excluded merely because it is signed by a Joint Director, if it falls within the statutory category of admissible laboratory reports. On these principles, the convictions were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>