<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (1) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310178</link>
    <description>A voluntary confession is not rendered inadmissible merely because it is later retracted, as constitutional protection against self-incrimination does not exclude a confession free from inducement, threat, or promise; the objection to use of the confessions therefore failed. On the facts, Kalawati&#039;s confession was unsafe as proof of murder, but the evidence supported that she made a false account to shield the offender, so her liability was confined to causing disappearance of evidence and screening the offender under Section 201 rather than murder. Ranjit Singh&#039;s murder conviction was sustained, but his sentence was reduced to transportation for life in light of the lapse of time and mitigating circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (1) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310178</link>
      <description>A voluntary confession is not rendered inadmissible merely because it is later retracted, as constitutional protection against self-incrimination does not exclude a confession free from inducement, threat, or promise; the objection to use of the confessions therefore failed. On the facts, Kalawati&#039;s confession was unsafe as proof of murder, but the evidence supported that she made a false account to shield the offender, so her liability was confined to causing disappearance of evidence and screening the offender under Section 201 rather than murder. Ranjit Singh&#039;s murder conviction was sustained, but his sentence was reduced to transportation for life in light of the lapse of time and mitigating circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>