<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1253 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the finding that the late filing of the audit report was a technical breach without any malicious intent, as the report was submitted before the completion of assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1253 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the finding that the late filing of the audit report was a technical breach without any malicious intent, as the report was submitted before the completion of assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>