<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1711 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310168</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the assessment reopening but directing the AO to grant the exemption for long-term capital gains under Section 10(38) regarding the treatment of income from the sale of shares. The tribunal found the reassessment invalid due to lack of disclosure by the assessee but could not quash it entirely as the challenge to disallowance under Section 14A was withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1711 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310168</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the assessment reopening but directing the AO to grant the exemption for long-term capital gains under Section 10(38) regarding the treatment of income from the sale of shares. The tribunal found the reassessment invalid due to lack of disclosure by the assessee but could not quash it entirely as the challenge to disallowance under Section 14A was withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>