https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444157 The judgment addressed the denial of appointment to a petitioner who met the qualifications for recruitment against sports quota vacancies due to the absence of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from her current employer, Central Railways. The petitioner secured the 4th rank in the recruitment examination. The issue revolved around the interpretation of the advertisement's requirements regarding the NOC. The petitioner's counsel argued that the NOC was not explicitly mandated for railway employees. The court scheduled further consideration after the petitioner obtained the NOC, potentially allowing her appointment as an Income Tax Officer/Tax Assistant. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444157 The judgment addressed the denial of appointment to a petitioner who met the qualifications for recruitment against sports quota vacancies due to the absence of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from her current employer, Central Railways. The petitioner secured the 4th rank in the recruitment examination. The issue revolved around the interpretation of the advertisement's requirements regarding the NOC. The petitioner's counsel argued that the NOC was not explicitly mandated for railway employees. The court scheduled further consideration after the petitioner obtained the NOC, potentially allowing her appointment as an Income Tax Officer/Tax Assistant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444157