https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444135 The court ruled that the request by respondent no. 2 to introduce a compilation of documents during the final hearing was not permissible. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the basic rules of pleadings and fairness in the adjudication process. Respondent no. 2 had multiple earlier opportunities to submit additional documents but failed to do so, disrupting the fairness of the process. Allowing new documents at that stage would prejudice the petitioners and harm their position, as it would not align with transparency and equal opportunity principles in the case. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:30:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444135 The court ruled that the request by respondent no. 2 to introduce a compilation of documents during the final hearing was not permissible. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the basic rules of pleadings and fairness in the adjudication process. Respondent no. 2 had multiple earlier opportunities to submit additional documents but failed to do so, disrupting the fairness of the process. Allowing new documents at that stage would prejudice the petitioners and harm their position, as it would not align with transparency and equal opportunity principles in the case. Case-Laws SEBI Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444135