<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 335 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444112</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that interest under Section 220(2) of the IT Act was chargeable from the original demand notice date of 25.03.1991, despite the appellant not being in default during that period. The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant is liable to pay interest as per the Tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing the need for interest payment from the original demand date due to non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 335 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444112</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that interest under Section 220(2) of the IT Act was chargeable from the original demand notice date of 25.03.1991, despite the appellant not being in default during that period. The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant is liable to pay interest as per the Tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing the need for interest payment from the original demand date due to non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>