<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1399 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310160</link>
    <description>A Commercial Court retains jurisdiction over execution proceedings arising from a foreign decree when the decree itself originates from a commercial dispute. A decree from a reciprocating territory presented under Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure is executed as if it were a district court decree, and execution does not fall outside the commercial dispute framework merely because the matter has reached the enforcement stage. The Gujarat HC relied on Sections 6, 16 and 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Sections 13, 38, 44A and 47 of the CPC, while treating the earlier Division Bench ruling on the same jurisdictional objection as governing authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1399 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310160</link>
      <description>A Commercial Court retains jurisdiction over execution proceedings arising from a foreign decree when the decree itself originates from a commercial dispute. A decree from a reciprocating territory presented under Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure is executed as if it were a district court decree, and execution does not fall outside the commercial dispute framework merely because the matter has reached the enforcement stage. The Gujarat HC relied on Sections 6, 16 and 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Sections 13, 38, 44A and 47 of the CPC, while treating the earlier Division Bench ruling on the same jurisdictional objection as governing authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>