https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310156 Parliament could validly regulate presidential election disputes by confining challenges to statutory grounds and prescribing procedural nomination rules, so the constitutional attack on Part III, Section 21 and the nomination provisions failed. Rejection of nomination papers based on missing certified electoral entries, age defects, or improper nomination was upheld, and the exclusion of Union Territory legislators from the presidential electoral college was confirmed because they were not members of State Legislative Assemblies under Article 54. On undue influence, bribery and related allegations, the Court held that political propaganda or defamatory material is not enough; proof of coercive interference, connivance by the returned candidate, and material effect on the result was lacking. en-us Mon, 14 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:55:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310156 Parliament could validly regulate presidential election disputes by confining challenges to statutory grounds and prescribing procedural nomination rules, so the constitutional attack on Part III, Section 21 and the nomination provisions failed. Rejection of nomination papers based on missing certified electoral entries, age defects, or improper nomination was upheld, and the exclusion of Union Territory legislators from the presidential electoral college was confirmed because they were not members of State Legislative Assemblies under Article 54. On undue influence, bribery and related allegations, the Court held that political propaganda or defamatory material is not enough; proof of coercive interference, connivance by the returned candidate, and material effect on the result was lacking. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310156