<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1464 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310150</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court reviewed a case involving the interpretation of Section 6A(1) of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, concerning Central Government approval for inquiries under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court referred the issue of the constitutionality of Section 6A(1) to a larger bench due to ambiguity regarding its prospective or retrospective effect, citing potential violations of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. Additionally, the Court sought clarification on whether a retrospective court judgment could deprive an accused of immunity under Article 20, leading to a reference to the Chief Justice of India for further examination by a larger bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:50:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1464 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310150</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court reviewed a case involving the interpretation of Section 6A(1) of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, concerning Central Government approval for inquiries under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court referred the issue of the constitutionality of Section 6A(1) to a larger bench due to ambiguity regarding its prospective or retrospective effect, citing potential violations of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. Additionally, the Court sought clarification on whether a retrospective court judgment could deprive an accused of immunity under Article 20, leading to a reference to the Chief Justice of India for further examination by a larger bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>