<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1687 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision of the CIT(A) to partially disallow prior period expenses claimed by a public sector undertaking. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s consistent accounting practice of booking such expenses was valid and supported by proper evidence, citing relevant case laws. The Tribunal emphasized the doctrine of consistency, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 11:25:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1687 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision of the CIT(A) to partially disallow prior period expenses claimed by a public sector undertaking. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s consistent accounting practice of booking such expenses was valid and supported by proper evidence, citing relevant case laws. The Tribunal emphasized the doctrine of consistency, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>