<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 44 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34224</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants as the Tribunal held that the GTA service for which service tax was paid should be considered as output service. The decision established that CENVAT credit could be used to discharge tax liability on output service, rendering the impugned order unsustainable. This judgment clarifies the interpretation of output service for service tax liability, permitting the use of CENVAT credit for GTA service tax payments and emphasizing consistency with legal provisions and binding decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 06:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 44 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34224</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants as the Tribunal held that the GTA service for which service tax was paid should be considered as output service. The decision established that CENVAT credit could be used to discharge tax liability on output service, rendering the impugned order unsustainable. This judgment clarifies the interpretation of output service for service tax liability, permitting the use of CENVAT credit for GTA service tax payments and emphasizing consistency with legal provisions and binding decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>