<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 307 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444084</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of total site expenses amounting to Rs. 3,67,37,203 was deleted. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to substantiate the disallowance, and in accordance with Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, allowed the expenditure incurred for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:05:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 307 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444084</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of total site expenses amounting to Rs. 3,67,37,203 was deleted. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to substantiate the disallowance, and in accordance with Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, allowed the expenditure incurred for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>