<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 288 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444065</link>
    <description>The appellant availed cenvat credit under a notification prescribing a concessional rate of duty of 4%. The department argued for a nil rate of duty exemption instead. The Tribunal found both exemptions to be conditional, allowing the appellant to choose. It held the appellant&#039;s choice to avail the 4% duty rate exemption was legal. The impugned order disallowing the cenvat credit was set aside, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2023 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 288 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444065</link>
      <description>The appellant availed cenvat credit under a notification prescribing a concessional rate of duty of 4%. The department argued for a nil rate of duty exemption instead. The Tribunal found both exemptions to be conditional, allowing the appellant to choose. It held the appellant&#039;s choice to avail the 4% duty rate exemption was legal. The impugned order disallowing the cenvat credit was set aside, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>