<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1474 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision to add Rs. 9,75,979 under section 14A of the Act, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess the case in line with High Court judgments. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity of scrutinizing accounts before making disallowances under section 14A and clarifying that disallowances should only cover expenses related to tax-exempt income, not the entire income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2023 11:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1474 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision to add Rs. 9,75,979 under section 14A of the Act, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess the case in line with High Court judgments. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity of scrutinizing accounts before making disallowances under section 14A and clarifying that disallowances should only cover expenses related to tax-exempt income, not the entire income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>