https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310136 Enforcement of a foreign award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was examined with respect to documentary compliance, execution objections, and substantive enforceability. Filing a duly authenticated copy of the award and a certified copy of the arbitration agreement was treated as sufficient under Section 47, and omission of collateral material did not defeat enforcement. Objections based on stamping, court fee, and territorial jurisdiction were rejected where the award was enforceable as a decree and assets were shown within jurisdiction. The award was also found not to violate the contract, FEMA, or the narrow public policy test applicable to foreign awards. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Oct 2023 11:06:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310136 Enforcement of a foreign award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was examined with respect to documentary compliance, execution objections, and substantive enforceability. Filing a duly authenticated copy of the award and a certified copy of the arbitration agreement was treated as sufficient under Section 47, and omission of collateral material did not defeat enforcement. Objections based on stamping, court fee, and territorial jurisdiction were rejected where the award was enforceable as a decree and assets were shown within jurisdiction. The award was also found not to violate the contract, FEMA, or the narrow public policy test applicable to foreign awards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310136