<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Accused Fails to Disprove Liability for Bounced Cheque; Presumption u/s 139 Stands Firm in Court Ruling.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72407</link>
    <description>Dishonour of Cheque - insufficient of funds - the presumption u/s 139 - the accused admitted the issuance of cheque, signature of cheque and thereby, he has to disprove the cheque and his liability but he failed to prove the same. Thereby, the aforesaid case law will squarely applicable to the present facts of the case. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 13:06:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 13:06:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Accused Fails to Disprove Liability for Bounced Cheque; Presumption u/s 139 Stands Firm in Court Ruling.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72407</link>
      <description>Dishonour of Cheque - insufficient of funds - the presumption u/s 139 - the accused admitted the issuance of cheque, signature of cheque and thereby, he has to disprove the cheque and his liability but he failed to prove the same. Thereby, the aforesaid case law will squarely applicable to the present facts of the case. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 13:06:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>