https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310130 The Court examined the cooperative society framework under the Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and the Apex Bank byelaws, holding that the statutory scheme preserved continuity of office until lawful successors assumed charge. On that basis, the Registrar could not validly assume charge merely because the committee's term expired while the election process for the constituent bodies remained incomplete and the existing office-bearers continued under an operative judicial mandate. The Court also held that quo warranto would not be issued to displace office-bearers where an earlier mandamus remained in force and the election process was underway, as such relief would serve no practical purpose. en-us Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Oct 2023 11:24:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310130 The Court examined the cooperative society framework under the Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and the Apex Bank byelaws, holding that the statutory scheme preserved continuity of office until lawful successors assumed charge. On that basis, the Registrar could not validly assume charge merely because the committee's term expired while the election process for the constituent bodies remained incomplete and the existing office-bearers continued under an operative judicial mandate. The Court also held that quo warranto would not be issued to displace office-bearers where an earlier mandamus remained in force and the election process was underway, as such relief would serve no practical purpose. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310130