<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1052 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310129</link>
    <description>Sterling, unimpeached defence material can justify quashing criminal proceedings in inherent jurisdiction when it conclusively displaces the prosecution case and trial would amount to abuse of process. Mobile-location and call-detail records, the complainant&#039;s admitted marital history, and medical material were treated as capable of acceptance without trial because they were not refuted and undermined the alleged place of occurrence and the factual basis of the accusations. On that footing, the allegations of rape on a false promise of marriage and outraging modesty were found unsustainable, as the relationship was inconsistent with the claim of inducement by marriage promise and the objective evidence did not support the prosecution version.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1052 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310129</link>
      <description>Sterling, unimpeached defence material can justify quashing criminal proceedings in inherent jurisdiction when it conclusively displaces the prosecution case and trial would amount to abuse of process. Mobile-location and call-detail records, the complainant&#039;s admitted marital history, and medical material were treated as capable of acceptance without trial because they were not refuted and undermined the alleged place of occurrence and the factual basis of the accusations. On that footing, the allegations of rape on a false promise of marriage and outraging modesty were found unsustainable, as the relationship was inconsistent with the claim of inducement by marriage promise and the objective evidence did not support the prosecution version.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>