<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1741 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310128</link>
    <description>In a mixed-funds situation, interest disallowance for funds diverted to an exempt unit was required to be recomputed by reference to the assessee&#039;s average cost of debt, not the borrowing rate alone. Notional interest on capital work in progress also had to follow the average-cost basis, but no separate disallowance was warranted for fixed assets created and put to use within the year. Web/software development expenditure was treated as part of a depreciable computer software asset and depreciation was allowed accordingly. For section 80IC recomputation, common expenses had to be rationally allocated across units, while any further adjustment could not result in double disallowance of the same expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1741 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310128</link>
      <description>In a mixed-funds situation, interest disallowance for funds diverted to an exempt unit was required to be recomputed by reference to the assessee&#039;s average cost of debt, not the borrowing rate alone. Notional interest on capital work in progress also had to follow the average-cost basis, but no separate disallowance was warranted for fixed assets created and put to use within the year. Web/software development expenditure was treated as part of a depreciable computer software asset and depreciation was allowed accordingly. For section 80IC recomputation, common expenses had to be rationally allocated across units, while any further adjustment could not result in double disallowance of the same expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>