https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310098 Section 42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 confers exclusive jurisdiction on the court where the first Part I application was filed, and an enforcement application under Section 36 is a subsequent proceeding arising out of the arbitration agreement and arbitral proceedings. The Act operates as a special code and prevails over inconsistent CPC procedures, so execution of the award did not require transfer under Section 39 in the circumstances described. Examination of the judgment-debtor could not be refused merely because assets or the debtor were outside territorial jurisdiction, as such examination serves to identify assets for satisfaction of the award. en-us Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Oct 2023 08:32:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310098 Section 42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 confers exclusive jurisdiction on the court where the first Part I application was filed, and an enforcement application under Section 36 is a subsequent proceeding arising out of the arbitration agreement and arbitral proceedings. The Act operates as a special code and prevails over inconsistent CPC procedures, so execution of the award did not require transfer under Section 39 in the circumstances described. Examination of the judgment-debtor could not be refused merely because assets or the debtor were outside territorial jurisdiction, as such examination serves to identify assets for satisfaction of the award. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310098