https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310101 An appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 was held not maintainable against an interlocutory order passed in Section 36 enforcement proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 directing release of part of the deposited award amount. The Delhi HC reasoned that Section 13 permits appeals only from orders falling within Order XLIII CPC or from orders expressly appealable under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Because Section 37 is exhaustive and Section 36 proceedings are merely executory steps for enforcement of the award, no separate appellate right arises. The Commercial Courts Act does not enlarge the limited appellate scheme governing arbitral matters. en-us Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Oct 2023 08:32:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310101 An appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 was held not maintainable against an interlocutory order passed in Section 36 enforcement proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 directing release of part of the deposited award amount. The Delhi HC reasoned that Section 13 permits appeals only from orders falling within Order XLIII CPC or from orders expressly appealable under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Because Section 37 is exhaustive and Section 36 proceedings are merely executory steps for enforcement of the award, no separate appellate right arises. The Commercial Courts Act does not enlarge the limited appellate scheme governing arbitral matters. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310101