https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310097 Alternative statutory remedy does not, by itself, bar writ jurisdiction, but departure is justified only in exceptional cases such as patent lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, or inefficacious remedy. The Rajasthan HC noted that the Tribunal had original jurisdiction under Section 14 of the National Green Tribunal Act over substantial environmental questions, and the limitation objection did not make its interim directions patently without jurisdiction because the Tribunal could consider condonation after hearing the parties. The statutory appellate remedy under Section 22 to the Supreme Court was also not shown to be ineffective, and the scheme required application of the sustainable development, precautionary principle, and polluter pays principle. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Oct 2023 08:32:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310097 Alternative statutory remedy does not, by itself, bar writ jurisdiction, but departure is justified only in exceptional cases such as patent lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, or inefficacious remedy. The Rajasthan HC noted that the Tribunal had original jurisdiction under Section 14 of the National Green Tribunal Act over substantial environmental questions, and the limitation objection did not make its interim directions patently without jurisdiction because the Tribunal could consider condonation after hearing the parties. The statutory appellate remedy under Section 22 to the Supreme Court was also not shown to be ineffective, and the scheme required application of the sustainable development, precautionary principle, and polluter pays principle. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310097