<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 108 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34211</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, holding that the return filed on 31st December 1991, though initially defective, was valid upon rectification within the stipulated period under Section 139(9). The return was also in conformity with the intent and purpose of the Act as per Section 292B. The notices and letters impugned by the petitioner were thus quashed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 108 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34211</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, holding that the return filed on 31st December 1991, though initially defective, was valid upon rectification within the stipulated period under Section 139(9). The return was also in conformity with the intent and purpose of the Act as per Section 292B. The notices and letters impugned by the petitioner were thus quashed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>