<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 284 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444061</link>
    <description>HC found the GST notice defective as it directly demanded payment without providing a proper show cause opportunity. The court directed respondent to issue a corrective notice giving petitioner 30 days to show cause, with final orders to be passed within six weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, mandating procedural compliance with Rule 142(1) of TNGST Rules, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 284 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444061</link>
      <description>HC found the GST notice defective as it directly demanded payment without providing a proper show cause opportunity. The court directed respondent to issue a corrective notice giving petitioner 30 days to show cause, with final orders to be passed within six weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, mandating procedural compliance with Rule 142(1) of TNGST Rules, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>