<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 31 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34210</link>
    <description>The Court held that the assessee was not entitled to deduction under Clause (viii) for sea freight expenditure as it was specifically excluded under Clause (iii) of Section 35B(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized statutory interpretation principles and ruled in favor of the revenue, overruling previous judgments that allowed such deductions. The matter was referred back to the Division Bench for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 31 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34210</link>
      <description>The Court held that the assessee was not entitled to deduction under Clause (viii) for sea freight expenditure as it was specifically excluded under Clause (iii) of Section 35B(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized statutory interpretation principles and ruled in favor of the revenue, overruling previous judgments that allowed such deductions. The matter was referred back to the Division Bench for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>