<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 279 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444056</link>
    <description>Where accused persons reside beyond the Magistrate&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, the amended Section 202 CrPC requires postponement of process and an inquiry or investigation before summons is issued. The text also states that a complaint arising from a business dispute over TDS deduction and non-deposit must disclose the essential ingredients of cheating, criminal breach of trust, or criminal conspiracy; absent deception from inception, dishonest inducement, or entrustment, criminal prosecution is not justified. The operative point is that non-compliance with Section 202 and absence of a prima facie criminal case make continuation of the proceeding unsustainable and amount to abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 23:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 279 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444056</link>
      <description>Where accused persons reside beyond the Magistrate&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, the amended Section 202 CrPC requires postponement of process and an inquiry or investigation before summons is issued. The text also states that a complaint arising from a business dispute over TDS deduction and non-deposit must disclose the essential ingredients of cheating, criminal breach of trust, or criminal conspiracy; absent deception from inception, dishonest inducement, or entrustment, criminal prosecution is not justified. The operative point is that non-compliance with Section 202 and absence of a prima facie criminal case make continuation of the proceeding unsustainable and amount to abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>