<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 275 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444052</link>
    <description>The court quashed the re-assessment notices and proceedings for AY 2014-15 and 2017-18, concluding that the assumption of jurisdiction was unjustified. It held that the officer lacked new and tangible information, as required under the new re-assessment scheme, to justify the proceedings. The officer&#039;s reliance on existing records did not meet the criteria for &#039;information&#039; suggesting escaped income. Consequently, the writ petitions were allowed, and the miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 275 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444052</link>
      <description>The court quashed the re-assessment notices and proceedings for AY 2014-15 and 2017-18, concluding that the assumption of jurisdiction was unjustified. It held that the officer lacked new and tangible information, as required under the new re-assessment scheme, to justify the proceedings. The officer&#039;s reliance on existing records did not meet the criteria for &#039;information&#039; suggesting escaped income. Consequently, the writ petitions were allowed, and the miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>