<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 266 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made on account of unexplained investment in jewellery. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s high social status and substantial declaration of jewellery value, finding no evidence that the items did not qualify as jewellery. As a result, the appeal was upheld on 27th September 2023, overturning the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 08:31:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 266 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made on account of unexplained investment in jewellery. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s high social status and substantial declaration of jewellery value, finding no evidence that the items did not qualify as jewellery. As a result, the appeal was upheld on 27th September 2023, overturning the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>